- #Fake motorola gp68 on ebay serial
- #Fake motorola gp68 on ebay drivers
- #Fake motorola gp68 on ebay update
- #Fake motorola gp68 on ebay driver
- #Fake motorola gp68 on ebay software
The issues are the previous FTDI drivers not working properly with the clones.
#Fake motorola gp68 on ebay software
As I also develop software which is not locked to my hardware (i dont mind homebrewers) I end up having to support people claiming my software is broken which wastes lots of my time and make my software look poor which it is not. Whilst some people understand I am producing quality hardware and clones are out there, there are others who dont care and buy cheap hardware from ebay thinking its the same thing. As someone who has been burnt with fake FTDIs, I now go out of my way to make sure my suppliers know I demand genuine hardware. In the really real world, companies get away with all sorts of morally questionable bull$it. I say all this, that this is how it SHOULD work.
#Fake motorola gp68 on ebay driver
Only if you refuse to forfeit it (and why would you do so? The genuine driver refuses to work with it, and the original supplier has no alternative drivers for you) would they then have legal grounds to become more aggressive, and only through appropriate legal channels. You’d be given the option to buy a genuine product.
Then they must give you a chance to voluntarily forfeit the device. The only legitimate way for a company to do this is to first prove and report that the chip is fake, via non intrusive driver checks.
In many parts of the world, you have the right not only to refuse to cooperate, but to shoot to kill such intruders. It is just some random people busting into your place. The key here is that it is not law enforcement officials, with proof and proper warrants.
Malicious code protections are functionally equivalent to FTDI engineers busting into your house, examining all of your hardware, and confiscating any suspicious chips. That is the responsibility of the courts and law enforcement. It is NOT, nor has it ever been the responsibility nor right of the manufacturer to enforce IP in such a way. Remember that until proven in a court of law that the device is in fact a fake, it, and the owner of the property must be considered innocent. Writing malicious code to permanently disable (even if it is reversible by some hackery) or potentially destroy counterfeit devices is another thing entirely. You should contact the supplier and ask for legitimate software, or better yet, buy a legitimate chip. Writing your driver in such a way that it notifies you when counterfeit devices are trying to use said driver is one thing.
#Fake motorola gp68 on ebay serial
Posted in hardware, News Tagged 232, FT232, FT232R, ftdi, serial Post navigation
#Fake motorola gp68 on ebay update
There will surely be an automated tool to fix these chips automatically, but until then, take a good look at what Windows Update is installing – it’s very hard to tell if your devices have a fake FTDI chip by just looking at them. The workaround for this driver update is to download the FT232 config tool from the FTDI website on a WinXP or Linux box, change the PID of the fake chip, and never using the new driver on a modern Windows system. A reasonable company would go after the manufacturers of fake chips, not the consumers who are most likely unaware they have a fake chip. It’s a bold strategy to cut down on silicon counterfeiters on the part of FTDI. The new driver for the FT232 exploits these differences, reprogramming it so it won’t work with existing drivers. it’s very hard to tell the difference between the real and fake versions by looking at the package, but a look at the silicon reveals vast differences. This renders the chip inaccessible from any OS, effectively bricking any device that happens to have one of these fake FTDI serial chips.īecause the FTDI USB to UART chip is so incredibly common, the market is flooded with clones and counterfeits. The new driver for these chips from FTDI, delivered through a recent Windows update, reprograms the USB PID to 0, something Windows, Linux, and OS X don’t like. Reports of problems with FTDI chips surfaced early this month, with an explanation of the behavior showing up in an EEVblog forum thread. This isn’t a case where fake FTDI chips won’t work if plugged into a machine running the newest FTDI driver the latest driver bricks the fake chips, rendering them inoperable with any computer. Thanks to a recent Windows update, all those fake FTDI chips are at risk of being bricked. It’s a simple chip, converting USB to a serial port, but very useful and probably one of the most cloned pieces of silicon on Earth. The FTDI FT232 chip is found in thousands of electronic baubles, from Arduinos to test equipment, and more than a few bits of consumer electronics.
0 kommentar(er)
